Share

Export Citation

APA
MLA
Chicago
Harvard
Vancouver
BIBTEX
RIS
Universitas Hasanuddin
Research output:Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Quality of antenatal care at community health centers and midwifery practitioner in Jeneponto

Tasya Z.

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Published: 2018

Abstract

This research aims to determine the difference of antenatal care quality at Pukesmas and midwifery practitioner in Jeneponto Regency.The type of research was observational analysis with cross sectional study design. The populations were pregnant women in Jeneponto regency from October 2015-may 2016 as many as 4,156 samples. The samples were pregnant women and midwifery practitioners, there were 182 respondents, and respectively 91 samples at puskesmas and 91 samples at midwifery practitioners. The samples were drawn with stratified random sampling method then analyzed using computer application of SPSS examined with chi square test. The results indicate that 72% of antenatal care both at puskesmas and at midwifery practitioner quality is categorized bad. There is difference of antenatal care quality at puskesmas and midwifery practitioner quality based on indicator of antenatal care examination such as body height (p=0.023), body weight (p=0.011), blood pressure (p=0.000), height of fundus uteri (p=0.001), fetus heart beat (p=0.000), immunization of TT (p=0.000), administration of Fe tablet (p=0.005), blood type test (p=0.011), and haemoglobin (Hb) examination (p=0.000). There is no quality difference of antenatal care based on measurement of upper arm (p=0.098).

Access to Document

10.1145/3242789.3242805

Other files and links

Fingerprint

MedicineSciences
ObstetricsSciences
Observational studySciences
Significant differenceSciences
Prenatal careSciences
Stratified samplingSciences
Test (biology)Sciences
Family medicineSciences
GynecologySciences
PopulationSciences
Environmental healthSciences
BiologySciences
PaleontologySciences
Internal medicineSciences
PathologySciences