# Legitimacy of Non-Formal Constitutional Reforms and Restrictions on Constitutionalism
> Jurdi F.

URL kanonis: https://discover.unhas.ac.id/publications/pub_scopus_85202590870
Jurnal / Konferensi: Jurnal Konstitusi
Tahun terbit: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2024
ISSN: 18297706
Kuartil SJR: Q2
Citations: 3

## Authors
- Jurdi F.

## Abstract
Non-formal constitutional change through legislative and judicial interpretation raises issues of legitimacy, and restrictions on non-formal changes can be made. This research aims to determine the legitimacy and explore the limitations of non-formal constitutional changes. This research uses normative legal methods with statutory, conceptual and case approaches. The results show that the legitimacy of non-formal constitutional changes is measured based on procedural legitimacy; that is, non-formal changes must be based on authority, and these changes do not affect the meaning of the Constitution as a whole. It is also measured based on substantial legitimacy; namely, non-formal changes to protect human rights. The limitation on changing the non-formal constitution is based on the main substance, which cannot be changed through non-formal changes such as constitutional structure, human rights, restrictions on authority and restrictions based on the moral constitution of the oath of office to implement and enforce the constitution.

## Keywords
- Legitimacy
- Constitutionalism
- Constitution
- Political science
- Normative
- Legislature
- Law
- Statutory interpretation
- Law and economics
- Statutory law
- Separation of powers
- Sociology
- Democracy
- Politics

---
Sumber: Discover Unhas — RIMS Universitas Hasanuddin.
Saat mengutip, gunakan DOI bila tersedia atau URL kanonis di atas.