Share
Export Citation
APA
MLA
Chicago
Harvard
Vancouver
BIBTEX
RIS
Universitas Hasanuddin
Research output:Contribution to journal›Article›peer-review
Capital equipment replacement under technological change
Mardin F.
Engineering Economist
Q3Published: 2012Citations: 25
Abstract
In this article, one of the commonly used replacement decision methods, the challenger–defender (CD) method, is modified. The proposed method is shown to outperform the original CD method and, in some cases, it outperforms the original economic life (EL) method. When the annual multiplier for the purchase price (a) is higher than that for the new asset operating and maintenance (O&M) costs (q), the solution of the modified CD method is more advantageous compared with the EL method when the new asset O&M costs purchased at time 0 (A) are higher. Furthermore, this modified CD method is more advantageous compared to the two-replacement-cycle method when the annual effective discount rate (d) is higher.
Access to Document
10.1080/0013791X.2012.677112Other files and links
Fingerprint
Multiplier (economics)Sciences
Asset (computer security)Sciences
Computer scienceSciences
EconomicsSciences
Operations researchSciences
EconometricsSciences
Reliability engineeringSciences
Operations managementSciences
MathematicsSciences
EngineeringSciences
MacroeconomicsSciences
Computer securitySciences