esc

Type at least two characters to start searching.

↑↓ select↵ openesc close

Share

Export Citation

APA
MLA
Chicago
Harvard
Vancouver
BIBTEX
RIS
Universitas Hasanuddin
Research output:Contribution to journal›Article›peer-review

Evaluation of the Clinical Success of CAD/CAM Dental Prostheses: A Systematic Review in Digital Prosthodontics

Ramadhany Y.F.

Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science

Q3
Published: 2026

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical success of Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) dental prostheses in terms of biological outcomes, marginal adaptation, patient satisfaction, and comfort.Methods: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and registered on January 11, 2026, in PROSPERO (CRD420261282946). Electronic searches for English-language publications from January 2014 to December 2025 were performed in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase, supplemented by searches in PubMed Central, ScienceDirect, and Wiley Online Library. Two independent reviewers screened the titles, abstracts, and full texts based on predefined eligibility criteria. The methodological quality of the included clinical studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.Results: The search initially identified 2.258 studies, of which 10 clinical studies involving 229 patients met the inclusion criteria. The included studies generally demonstrated a low-to-moderate risk of bias and reported favorable outcomes for CAD/CAM prostheses in terms of time efficiency, marginal adaptation, and patient-reported comfort compared with conventional techniques.Conclusion: CAD/CAM technology demonstrates generally favorable clinical outcomes in prosthodontic rehabilitation, particularly in terms of time efficiency, marginal adaptation, and patient-reported outcomes. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution due to the limited number of studies, heterogeneity, and lack of quantitative synthesis. Further high-quality clinical studies are required to strengthen the evidence.

Access to Document

10.65844/2503-0825.1509

Other files and links

Fingerprint

MedicineSciences
ProsthodonticsSciences
MEDLINESciences
Systematic reviewSciences
Medical physicsSciences
DentistrySciences
Cochrane LibrarySciences
Quality (philosophy)Sciences
Meta-analysisSciences
Inclusion (mineral)Sciences
Physical therapySciences
Family medicineSciences
Alternative medicineSciences
Cochrane collaborationSciences
Quality assessmentSciences
Quality of evidenceSciences
PsychologySciences
Evidence-based medicineSciences
Clinical trialSciences