esc

Type at least two characters to start searching.

↑↓ select↵ openesc close

Share

Export Citation

APA
MLA
Chicago
Harvard
Vancouver
BIBTEX
RIS
Universitas Hasanuddin
Research output:Contribution to journal›Article›peer-review

Antecedents of corruption in the perspective of local government employees: A fraud hexagon theory approach

Indrijawati A.

Public and Municipal Finance

Q3
Published: 2025Citations: 3

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the factors that influence the occurrence of accounting fraud in local governments using the fraud hexagon theory. This study focused on Enrekang Regency government employees in South Sulawesi Province, Indonesia. Data were collected by distributing questionnaires to financial managers in 38 offices, agencies, and divisions. Then, using the purposive sampling method, 157 local government employees were selected for the study. Data were analyzed using multiple linear regression analysis via SPSS version 23 software. The results showed that pressure, collusion, opportunity, and rationalization have a significant positive impact on corruption (β = 0.480, p-value 0.000 < 0.05; β = 0.211, p-value 0.001 < 0.05; β = 0.511, p-value 0.000 < 0.05; β = 0.133, p-value 0.020 < 0.05, respectively). Capability has an insignificant impact on corruption (β = 0.021, p-value 0.643 < 0.05), while arrogance has a significant negative impact on corruption (β = –0.229, p-value 0.004 < 0.05). The study offers implications for academics as the findings can be used as an additional reference for research in the field of fraud hexagon and corruption. The research results can contribute to theory development, particularly those related to fraud theory, as well as add empirical evidence in accounting research studies, particularly in terms of factors that influence corruption.

Access to Document

10.21511/pmf.14(1).2025.09

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Perspective (graphical)Sciences
Language changeSciences
Government (linguistics)Sciences
BusinessSciences
Public relationsSciences
PsychologySciences
Social psychologySciences
Political scienceSciences
Computer scienceSciences
LinguisticsSciences
LiteratureSciences
ArtSciences
Artificial intelligenceSciences
PhilosophySciences