Comparison between radial versus femoral percutaneous coronary intervention access in Indonesian hospitals, 2017–2018: A prospective observational study of a national registry

Abstract

Higher rate of adverse events was noted on the femoral access group. However, it might stem from the fact that patients with more comorbidities and complex lesions are more likely to be assigned to femoral access-group. Neither radial or femoral access is superior in terms of in-hospital mortality upon propensity-score matching/multivariable analysis.

Access to Document

Other files and links

• Link to publication in Scopus
• Open Access Version Available

Fingerprint