Share

Export Citation

APA
MLA
Chicago
Harvard
Vancouver
BIBTEX
RIS
Universitas Hasanuddin
Research output:Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Blind spots and spotlights in bureaucratic politics: An analysis of policy co-production in environmental governance dynamics in Indonesia

Sahide M.A.K.

Development Policy Review

Q2
Published: 2023Citations: 4

Abstract

Summary Motivation There has been growing interest in recent years in a better understanding of knowledge/science and policy co‐production in environmental governance. Purpose We aim to shed more light on the politics among the numerous actors shaping ideas that drive environmental policy in Indonesia. We focus our theoretical engagement on a framing of bureaucratic politics, which is a research tradition that has made various strides in explaining the formal and non‐formal processes that influence environmental governance outcomes. Methods and approach Building from a wide range of case studies drawn from deep engagement of participatory research in policy‐making in Indonesia, we established a simple typology that helps explain eight categories that emerge when bureaucracies, knowledge institutions, and publics come together to shape environmental governance outcomes. Findings The bureaucratic politics specifically clarified the features of cases that have clear fragmentation of bureaucracy but clear explanation variables from the formal and informal interest of bureaucracy. Potential uncovered by bureaucratic politics framing means that, if the metapolitical works alter, the bureaucracy works smoothly or makes it impossible for bureaucracy to operationalize their formal and informal interest in capturing the dynamics of macro and micro politics. In terms of form of knowledge, knowledge produced “from below” can also be used in policy co‐production. It can be produced by non‐expert actors, or from dialogue among them and sympathetic experts that occur below the bureaucracy's radar (people‐driven). Policy implications Our ideal policy co‐production implication is where the three actors have a strong foundation of “common consciousness” and interact equally to address a particular environmental policy agenda, with enough working space to jointly commit to creating the knowledge base to shape policy.

Access to Document

10.1111/dpr.12693

Other files and links

Fingerprint

BureaucracySciences
Framing (construction)Sciences
PoliticsSciences
Corporate governanceSciences
Political scienceSciences
Environmental governanceSciences
Citizen journalismSciences
Public administrationSciences
SociologySciences
Political economySciences
EconomicsSciences
LawSciences
ManagementSciences
Structural engineeringSciences
EngineeringSciences